Section 3 Application and interpretation of Act

  1. This Act applies to the processing of personal information—
    1. entered in a record by or for a responsible party by making use of automated or non-automated means: Provided that when the recorded personal information is processed by non-automated means, it forms part of a filing system or is intended to form part thereof; and
    2. where the responsible party is—
      1. domiciled in the Republic; or
      2. not domiciled in the Republic, but makes use of automated or non-automated means in the Republic, unless those means are used only to forward personal information through the Republic.
    1. This Act applies, subject to paragraph (b), to the exclusion of any provision of any other legislation that regulates the processing of personal information and that is materially inconsistent with an object, or a specific provision, of this Act.
    2. If any other legislation provides for conditions for the lawful processing of personal information that are more extensive than those set out in Chapter 3, the extensive conditions prevail.
  2. This Act must be interpreted in a manner that—
    1. gives effect to the purpose of the Act set out in section 2; and
    2. does not prevent any public or private body from exercising or performing its powers, duties and functions in terms of the law as far as such powers, duties and functions relate to the processing of personal information and such processing is in accordance with this Act or any other legislation, as referred to in subsection (2), that regulates the processing of personal information.
  3. ‘‘Automated means’’, for the purposes of this section, means any equipment capable of operating automatically in response to instructions given for the purpose of processing information.

Section 6 Exclusions

  1. (1) This Act does not apply to the processing of personal information—
    1. in the course of a purely personal or household activity;
    2. that has been de-identified to the extent that it cannot be re-identified again;
    3. by or on behalf of a public body—
      1. which involves national security, including activities that are aimed at assisting in the identification of the financing of terrorist and related activities, defence or public safety; or
      2. the purpose of which is the prevention, detection, including assistance in the identification of the proceeds of unlawful activities and the combating of money laundering activities, investigation or proof of offences, the prosecution of offenders or the execution of sentences or security measures, to the extent that adequate safeguards have been established in legislation for the protection of such personal information;
    4. by the Cabinet and its committees or the Executive Council of a province; or
    5. relating to the judicial functions of a court referred to in section 166 of the Constitution.
  2. ‘‘Terrorist and related activities’’, for purposes of subsection (1)(c), means those activities referred to in section 4 of the Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act, 2004 (Act No. 33 of 2004).

Section 7 Exclusion for journalistic, literary or artistic purposes

  1. This Act does not apply to the processing of personal information solely for the purpose of journalistic, literary or artistic expression to the extent that such an exclusion is necessary to reconcile, as a matter of public interest, the right to privacy with the right to freedom of expression.
  2. Where a responsible party who processes personal information for exclusively journalistic purposes is, by virtue of office, employment or profession, subject to a code of ethics that provides adequate safeguards for the protection of personal information, such code will apply to the processing concerned to the exclusion of this Act and any alleged interference with the protection of the personal information of a data subject that may arise as a result of such processing must be adjudicated as provided for in terms of that code.
  3. In the event that a dispute may arise in respect of whether adequate safeguards have been provided for in a code as required in terms of subsection (2) or not, regard may be had to—
    1. the special importance of the public interest in freedom of expression;
    2. domestic and international standards balancing the—
      1. public interest in allowing for the free flow of information to the public through the media in recognition of the right of the public to be informed; and
      2. public interest in safeguarding the protection of personal information of data subjects;
    3. the need to secure the integrity of personal information;
    4. domestic and international standards of professional integrity for journalists; and
    5. the nature and ambit of self-regulatory forms of supervision provided by the profession.